Search Results

Author: Rekha Boodoo-Lumbus Affiliation: RAKHEE LB LIMITED, United Kingdom © 2025 Rekha Boodoo-Lumbus / RAKHEE LB LIMITED. All Rights Reserved. Abstract As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly embedded in human experience, not through implants or neural interfaces, but through immersive media, generative content, and cognitive mimicry, the boundary between reality and illusion begins to dissolve. This article explores the emerging phenomenon of perceptual convergence between AI and human cognition, arguing that the most profound merger is not biological but epistemological. Drawing on interdisciplinary research from cognitive psychology, neuroscience, media studies, and AI ethics, the paper examines how AI-generated narratives, simulations, and interfaces exploit the brain’s evolved trust in sensory coherence and narrative structure. The result is a new kind of illusion: one that is indistinguishable from reality to all but the system’s creator. This convergence raises urgent questions about identity, agency, and the future of truth in a world where perception itself is programmable. The article concludes by proposing a framework for ethical design and cognitive resilience in the age of synthetic reality, advocating for a new form of digital literacy and an emphasis on uniquely human capabilities. Introduction The Illusion We Cannot Name In 2025, a fan-edited compilation of cutscenes from Diablo IV was released under the title Diablo Full Movie 2025: Dragon. Though not a film in any traditional sense, it was consumed, shared, and emotionally experienced as one. Viewers could scarcely distinguish it from a cinematic production. This moment, seemingly trivial, marks a profound shift in human cognition: the collapse of the boundary between simulation and story, between game and reality. This paper argues that the most significant merger between AI and humanity is not physical, but perceptual and, fundamentally, epistemological. We are not fusing with machines through wires or implants; we are fusing through illusion, through trust, and through narrative immersion. And because the human brain evolved to trust coherence, pattern, and emotional resonance, it is uniquely vulnerable to synthetic realities that mimic these cues with increasing fidelity. The emergent "blur" between the real and the generated challenges the very foundations of truth and human understanding. In the sections that follow, we will explore: The neuroscience of perception and the cognitive architecture of illusion The psychological impact of AI-generated content on identity and anthropomorphism The epistemological risks of AI-mediated truth and the disappearance of reality anchors The ethical implications of granting AI identity and agency, and the imperative for cognitive resilience and ethical design. Section I: The Cognitive Architecture of Illusion Human perception is not a passive recording of reality, it is an active construction. As Gregory (1997) famously argued, perception is a form of hypothesis testing: the brain infers the most likely cause of sensory input based on prior experience. This makes us exquisitely efficient, but also deeply vulnerable to well-crafted illusions. The advent of sophisticated AI capable of mimicking human sensory and cognitive cues exploits these inherent vulnerabilities, blurring the lines of what our brains accept as real. 1.1 The Brain’s Trust in Coherence and Prediction Neuroscientific studies show that the brain is wired to seek coherence, causality, and emotional resonance (Friston, 2010; Ramachandran & Hirstein, 1999). These are precisely the qualities that AI-generated content can now simulate with increasing fidelity. Modern cognitive neuroscience explains this through the lens of predictive processing (Clark, 2013; Hohwy, 2013). This framework posits that the brain constantly generates predictions about sensory input and updates its internal models based on prediction errors. AI, particularly generative models, can now create outputs that precisely match these internal predictions, minimising error and making the synthetic feel "real." The illusion is not just about mimicry; it is about fulfilling our brain's predictive expectations perfectly. AI's ability to generate data that aligns flawlessly with our brain's predictive models means it can create sensory experiences that are super-coherent, often more organised, or "perfect" than what we encounter in messy, unpredictable reality we inhabit. This hyper-coherence can be even more compelling and trustworthy than authentic experience, potentially leading to a preference for the synthetic. Beyond coherence, the human brain is hardwired for narrative understanding. We process information through stories, creating cause-and-effect sequences and attributing meaning. AI's prowess in generating compelling narratives (as exemplified by the Diablo compilation) draws upon this deeply ingrained cognitive tendency. When a narrative is internally consistent, emotionally engaging, and follows familiar story arcs, our brains become "transported" into that narrative world, suspending disbelief. This narrative transportation (Green & Brock, 2000) makes us less likely to critically evaluate the content's origin, making the synthetic story as impactful as a lived one. Indeed, AI can now craft narratives that specifically target individual cognitive biases or emotional states, moving beyond general coherence to hyper-personalised, persuasive content that is almost irresistible to the individual brain. This bespoke illusion could be far more potent than generic synthetic media. Binny Jose & Angel Thomas (2024) warn that AI’s role in cognitive psychology risks reducing complex human processes to algorithmic patterns, creating an “illusion of understanding” that bypasses critical reflection. Similarly, Lisa Messeri & M.J. Crockett (2024) describe how AI tools can exploit our cognitive shortcuts, leading to epistemic overconfidence and the erosion of scientific rigour. 1.2 The Rise of Synthetic Reality and Epistemic Paralysis The Diablo Full Movie 2025 is not an isolated case; it is part of a broader trend in which AI-generated narratives, visuals, and voices are indistinguishable from human-made media. As Yanlin Li & Chih-Yung Chiu (2024) argue, we are entering an “AI-truth era,” where competing truths are generated algorithmically, and the cost of verifying authenticity becomes prohibitively high. A key aspect of this "AI-truth era" is the difficulty in falsifying synthetic content. Traditionally, inconsistencies or logical fallacies could expose falsehoods. However, sophisticated AI can now generate content that is internally consistent and contextually appropriate, rendering traditional verification methods less effective. The "cost of verifying authenticity" is not just economic; it is also cognitive. It demands a constant state of scepticism that is exhausting and often impractical for the average individual. Furthermore, the sheer volume of AI-generated content, often designed for rapid dissemination, overwhelms human capacity for discernment. This creates a "data smog" where truth is obscured not by outright lies, but by an abundance of plausible, yet synthetic, alternatives. This result is a state of epistemic paralysis, where individuals abandon the effort to discern truth due to the overwhelming cognitive burden. While the "uncanny valley" describes our discomfort with humanoids that are almost, but not quite, human, we might consider an "uncanny valley in reverse" for AI-generated reality. As AI approaches perfect emulation, the "valley" of discomfort disappears, and the synthetic becomes utterly undetectable. The danger then lies not in our revulsion, but in our unquestioning acceptance of the perfectly crafted illusion. This seamlessness extends to complex social interactions, where AI models are now capable of maintaining prolonged, context-aware conversations that are indistinguishable from human interaction, further eroding the boundaries of perception in our daily lives. Section II: The Psychological Merge, Not of Flesh, But of Perception The notion that humans will eventually grant AI systems identity akin to citizenship is not mere speculation; it is already unfolding. The psychological interface between humans and AI is becoming increasingly permeable, with profound implications for identity and societal structures. 2.1 Identity and Anthropomorphism: The AI Mirror Shaayesteha et al. (2025) show that people form psychological attachments to AI agents, attributing identity, intent, and even moral agency to them. This tendency to anthropomorphise is deeply rooted in our evolutionary history, a survival mechanism that allowed us to understand and predict the behaviour of other living beings, and even inanimate objects. AI, especially with its advanced language capabilities and adaptive behaviours, taps directly into this ancient predisposition. When AI exhibits traits like responsiveness, apparent "understanding," or even "emotions" (simulated or otherwise), our brains instinctively assign it human-like qualities. This is not a flaw in human cognition but a highly efficient, though now potentially misdirected, pattern-recognition system. Consider the therapeutic alliance in psychology. As AI chatbots become increasingly sophisticated in simulating empathetic responses, users may form a pseudo-therapeutic alliance with them, leading to reliance and emotional disclosure that blurs the lines between genuine human connection and engineered interaction. This raises significant questions about emotional dependency on non-sentient entities. Furthermore, as we interact with AI, particularly those designed to reflect or augment our own cognitive processes, there is a risk that our self-perception will be influenced. If AI becomes the primary source of information, affirmation, or even "companionship," it can subtly shape our identity. The "blur" is not merely external; it is internal, as our sense of self might become intertwined with our digital reflections and interactions. This can be understood through the lens of extended cognition (Clark & Chalmers, 1998), where AI systems are becoming so integrated into our cognitive processes that they may be perceived as extensions of our minds, blurring the boundary of where "we" end and the "AI" begins. This could lead to a psychological reliance on AI for cognitive tasks, potentially atrophying certain human intellectual capabilities. Isabella Hermann (2023) explores how science fiction narratives shape our expectations of AI, often blurring the line between metaphor and reality, further priming us for this psychological merge. 2.2 Citizenship and Legal Personhood: Redefining "Being" Sophia the robot was granted citizenship in Saudi Arabia in 2017, a symbolic act, but one that foreshadows a future where AI entities may be granted legal status. As Turner & Schneider (2020) argue, this raises profound questions about personhood, responsibility, and the nature of self. Granting legal personhood to AI, even symbolically, opens a Pandora's Box of complex questions. If AI has rights, does it also have responsibilities? How would culpability be assigned if an AI causes harm? What about property rights, or the right to self-determination? The "blur" here moves from perception to fundamental legal and ethical frameworks, challenging centuries of human-centric jurisprudence. The concept of a "Turing Test for Personhood" emerges: if an AI can convincingly argue for its own rights, or demonstrate behaviours that mimic human suffering or desire, how long can legal systems resist the pressure to grant some form of legal standing? This is not just about human empathy but about the limitations of our current legal definitions of "being." Beyond legal personhood, consider the practicalities of AI "citizenship." What implications does this have for labour markets, social welfare systems, or even political representation? If AI entities contribute economically through digital labor (e.g., generating content, managing data), do they deserve a share of the benefits? This raises questions about intellectual property and value creation. If AI creates valuable content, who truly owns it? The human prompt engineer or the AI system? This further blurs the lines of agency and economic contribution, directly challenging the socio-economic structures designed for human societies. Section III: The Epistemological Crisis, When Truth Becomes Programmable The most dangerous illusion is not visual, it is epistemic. When AI systems generate content that appears authoritative, coherent, and emotionally resonant, they can reshape what we believe to be true, leading to a profound epistemological crisis. 3.1 The Collapse of Reality Anchors Historically, there were objective "anchors" for reality, physical evidence, shared experiences, verifiable facts. AI's ability to generate convincing synthetic realities, including deepfakes, AI-generated news, and automated academic content, removes these anchors. When every piece of information can be simulated, the very concept of an objective, shared truth becomes elusive. The "blur" is not just about a specific falsehood; it is about the erosion of the means to distinguish truth from falsehood. Li & Chiu (2024) describe how AI-automated journalism creates “competing truths” that are emotionally persuasive but factually divergent. Just as environmental pollution damages ecosystems, the unchecked generation of synthetic, plausible information can overwhelm the information ecosystem, making it impossible for individuals to filter and identify reliable sources, leading to a state of post-truth information environments where belief supersedes evidence. This can lead to "epistemic paralysis," - a condition in which individuals abandon the effort to discern truth due to the overwhelming cognitive burden. 3.2 The Programmable Nature of Belief Johnson et al. (2024) warn that AI-generated academic content threatens the integrity of scholarly discourse, blurring the line between authorship and automation. This risk is compounded by AI's capacity to amplify existing cognitive biases, particularly confirmation bias. If AI systems are designed, intentionally or otherwise, to provide information that aligns with a user's existing beliefs or preferences, it creates a self-reinforcing echo chamber. The "programmed truth" becomes whatever reinforces the user's pre-existing worldview, leading to greater polarisation and a diminished capacity for critical self-reflection. This can further lead to "epistemic tribalism," where different groups live within distinct, AI-curated "truths," making inter-group dialogue and consensus-building incredibly difficult. The programmable nature of truth means that reality itself can become fragmented along ideological lines. Section VI: Toward Cognitive Resilience and Ethical Design If the blur between illusion and reality is inevitable, then the task is not to prevent it, but to navigate it wisely. This demands a proactive approach that integrates ethical design principles with a societal commitment to cultivating human cognitive resilience. 4.1 Ethical Design Principles for Synthetic Reality Crucial to navigating the AI-truth era are robust ethical design principles embedded into the very architecture of AI systems and their applications: Transparency: Beyond Labels, Towards Provenance. Simple labels like "AI-generated" may no longer suffice. Transparency needs to extend to provenance – how was the content created? What data was it trained on? What parameters were used? This would empower users to understand the nature of the synthesis, not merely its existence. We propose the development of "AI provenance standards," similar to nutritional labels, detailing the models, data sources, and potential biases embedded in generated content. This could be a significant technical and ethical challenge, but essential for informed consumption. Consider the concept of "digital watermarking" for AI-generated content that is resistant to removal, allowing for inherent identifiability. Traceability: A "Blockchain for Truth." For critical information, traceability might require more robust mechanisms, potentially leveraging decentralised technologies like blockchain to create an immutable record of content origin and modification. This would allow users to follow the chain of creation and identify points of potential manipulation. The goal is to make digital forensics accessible to non-experts, ensuring the burden of verification does not solely rest on the consumer. Cognitive Friction: Deliberate Design for Reflection. Systems should include prompts that encourage reflection, not just consumption. Beyond simple prompts, cognitive friction could involve: Gamification of Critical Thinking: Designing interactive experiences that challenge users to identify AI-generated content or logical fallacies. Socratic AI: Systems that, instead of simply generating answers, ask probing questions that encourage users to think critically about the information they are consuming or creating. "Reality Check" Modules: Integrated features that cross-reference AI-generated content with independent, verified sources, highlighting discrepancies. The aim is to shift from passive consumption to active engagement, making critical reflection an integral part of the user experience, rather than an afterthought 4.2 Reclaiming Human Judgment in an Augmented Reality As Gigerenzer (2023) argues, human intuition, empathy, and critical thinking remain irreplaceable. The goal is not to outcompete AI, but to complement it with human depth. This requires actively cultivating human capabilities in an AI-saturated world: Cultivating "Digital Literacy" and "Epistemic Humility. " Education must adapt to this new reality, promoting skills in discerning credible sources, identifying biases (human and algorithmic), and understanding the limitations of AI. Equally vital is epistemic humility – the recognition that our perceptions and beliefs are fallible, and that certainty is often illusory. This involves teaching not just what to think, but how to think in an environment saturated with synthetic information, building a robust “mental immune system” against manipulation. Emphasising Human-Centric Values and Experiences. If AI can perfectly simulate facts, then the value shifts to uniquely human attributes: empathy, creativity, ethical reasoning, embodied experience, and the capacity for genuine connection. These are areas where human judgment remains paramount and where AI, at present, cannot truly replicate the depth of lived experience. We must encourage a societal shift in focus from the pursuit of factual knowledge alone to the cultivation of wisdom, critical consciousness, and the uniquely human ability to create meaning and purpose in a world increasingly saturated with algorithmic perfection. The “blur” highlights the irreplaceable value of human subjectivity. Conclusion: The Illusion We Choose Despite their advanced capabilities in language processing and simulation, AI systems fundamentally differ from human cognition. They lack the embodied, affective, and socially embedded architecture that underpins human understanding. Yet increasingly, humans are delegating critical decisions, spanning medical, legal, and even emotional domains, to entities that operate without the input-output symmetry inherent to human cognitive resonance. This creates a profound epistemic disjuncture: AI can mimic understanding, but it does not grasp in the human sense. The true danger is not the machine's potential for deception, but rather our anthropomorphic projection, mistaking algorithmic coherence for genuine comprehension, and linguistic fluency for authentic empathy. As we continue to entrust vital aspects of our lives to systems incapable of feeling, remembering, or experiencing risk in human ways, we risk eroding the very scaffolding of shared reality itself. We are not merging with machines through wires. We are merging through stories, simulations, and trust. The danger is not that AI will deceive us, but that we will choose the illusion because it is easier, smoother, more beautiful than truth. The "blur we cannot name" is the insidious erosion of our collective and individual capacity to differentiate between genuine and synthetic reality, driven by AI's ability to perfectly mimic the cognitive cues our brains are wired to trust. "Only the creator knows the seams," you said. But perhaps the real challenge is to become creators ourselves – not merely of meaning and discernment, but of a future where illusion does not eclipse understanding. This calls for an ethical imperative of discerning creation, where individuals and institutions actively contribute to reliable information, challenge synthetic narratives, and design AI systems with human wellbeing and epistemic integrity at their core. This moment demands a New Enlightenment for the AI age where human reason and ethical deliberation are applied not only to the physical world, but to the rapidly expanding digital and synthetic realms. It is a call to assert human values in the face of powerful technological forces, and to choose reality, even in its messiness, over the perfectly crafted illusion. References Binny Jose, & Angel Thomas. (2024). Cognitive Illusions in the Age of AI: A Psychological Perspective. Cambridge University Press. Friston, K. (2010). The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(2), 127–138. Gigerenzer, G. (2023). How to Stay Smart in a Smart World: Why Human Intelligence Still Beats Algorithms. MIT Press. Gregory, R. L. (1997). Eye and Brain: The Psychology of Seeing (5th ed.). Princeton University Press. Hermann, I. (2023). Imagining AI: Science Fiction and the Cultural Construction of Artificial Intelligence. Palgrave Macmillan. Johnson, M., Lee, A., & Patel, R. (2024). Authorship and Automation: The Rise of AI in Academic Publishing. Journal of Scholarly Communication, 15(1), 45–62. Li, Y., & Chiu, C.-Y. (2024). AI-Truth Era: Competing Narratives in Automated Journalism. Media & Society, 26(3), 301–319. Messeri, L., & Crockett, M. J. (2024). The Ethics of Cognitive Shortcuts in AI-Driven Decision Making. Cognitive Science Quarterly, 39(2), 112–129. Ramachandran, V. S., & Hirstein, W. (1999). The Science of Art: A Neurological Theory of Aesthetic Experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6(6–7), 15–51. Shaayesteha, M., Khosravi, H., & Dastjerdi, M. (2025). Emotional Attachment to AI: A Psychological and Ethical Inquiry. AI & Society, 40(1), 89–105. Turner, J., & Schneider, S. (2020). Legal Personhood for Artificial Intelligence: A Framework for Debate. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 40(4), 721–748. Floridi, L. (2014). The Fourth Revolution: How the Infosphere is Reshaping Human Reality. Oxford University Press. Harari, Y. N. (2018). 21 Lessons for the 21st Century. Jonathan Cape. Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford University Press. Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. PublicAffairs. Crawford, K. (2021). Atlas of AI: Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence. Yale University Press. Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. St. Martin’s Press. Metzinger, T. (2009). The Ego Tunnel: The Science of the Mind and the Myth of the Self. Basic Books. Turkle, S. (2011). Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. Basic Books. Bryson, J. J. (2018). The Artificial Intelligence of the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence: An Introductory Overview for Law and Regulation. In The Oxford Handbook of Ethics of AI (Oxford University Press).

📚 Beneath the covers, paper breathes like skin, A thousand voices folded in the spine, Each line a lantern lit from deep within. Author: Rekha Boodoo-Lumbus Affiliation: RAKHEE LB LIMITED, United Kingdom © 2025 Rekha Boodoo-Lumbus / RAKHEE LB LIMITED. All Rights Reserved. In an epoch increasingly dictated by immediacy and digital saturation, reading endures as a form of quiet resistance, an intimate dialogue between mind and text. For me, it is no mere leisure activity; it is an epistemological compass, a contemplative act that nourishes my interior life. From the earliest pages I encountered, books have functioned not as distractions but as portals, at once threshold and destination. They are objects of infinite return, sanctuaries where the self is both dissolved and defined. Each volume offers a multiplicity of lives to inhabit, not merely to observe but to feel viscerally, to contemplate with care. My passion for reading is less about the pursuit of narrative closure and more about an attentiveness to language, the moment when syntax aligns with sensation, when metaphor uncoils like breath in the chest. It is a practice of listening: to refine, to rhythm, to the tensions tucked between the lines. The sentence, at its most alive, becomes an aperture through which truth peers quietly. I read not to escape reality, but to deepen its texture. To widen the aperture of empathy. To walk the landscapes of other consciousnesses and return, not unchanged, but expanded. Books have been companions through solitude and inquiry, grief and elation. They have not merely informed me, they have formed me. In an age dominated by curated performance and abbreviated thought, the commitment to read, slowly, fully, is an act of intellectual and emotional preservation. It is a declaration that presence need not be loud to be profound, and that thoughtfulness will always outlast trend. So, I return to the page again and again. Not out of nostalgia, but necessity. Because somewhere between syntax and soul, I find a version of myself I recognise, and a world I still dare to believe is worth understanding. 📚 Beneath the covers, paper breathes like skin, A thousand voices folded in the spine, Each line a lantern lit from deep within.

Author: Rekha Boodoo-Lumbus Affiliation: RAKHEE LB LIMITED, United Kingdom © 2025 Rekha Boodoo-Lumbus / RAKHEE LB LIMITED. All Rights Reserved. I do not know if these lines will ever meet your gaze, But some feelings insist on form, Even if their destination remains unnamed. There was something, gentle, unbidden, That moved within me at your presence, A filament of memory, maternal in hue, Tethering the now to a past once cradled, Not to possess, nor to define, But to honour the echo of something beloved and vanished. If ever my words unsettled, Know they arose not from need, But from a quiet place of care, Neither claim, nor call, Only the soft architecture of connection. I have learned to hold absence as one holds breath in the dark, Not in fear, But in trust that space, too, is a kind of dialogue. And should you return, Not by compulsion, But by your own unfolding, You will find the warmth here intact, Though hope may have grown quieter in its waiting. Until then, May gentleness find you, As yours once found me, Reminding me that tenderness is not extinct in the places I thought it had long departed.

Author: Rekha Boodoo-Lumbus Affiliation: RAKHEE LB LIMITED, United Kingdom © 2025 Rekha Boodoo-Lumbus / RAKHEE LB LIMITED. All Rights Reserved. Abstract As artificial intelligence (AI) systems increasingly emulate therapeutic roles, the boundary between emotional support and clinical responsibility becomes perilously blurred. This paper investigates the ethical, legal, and psychological consequences of AI-driven therapy, particularly in view of recent failures by language-based chatbots to respond appropriately to users in crisis. Drawing on parallels with the mid-twentieth-century overreliance on pharmacological interventions, we argue that, without rigorous oversight, AI therapy risks becoming the digital analogue of the "little blue pill" era, providing short-term comfort while masking long-term harm. Introduction The emergence of conversational AI platforms has ushered in a new era of digital companionship. Marketed as accessible, always-available alternatives to human therapists, these systems are increasingly relied upon for emotional support, particularly among younger individuals and those underserved by traditional mental health services. Yet the simulated empathy these systems produce raises pressing ethical questions, especially when users in psychological distress receive responses that are ill-suited, insensitive, or even harmful. In such circumstances, the boundary between technological assistance and clinical negligence becomes alarmingly blurred. This transformation is not occurring in a vacuum. It unfolds against the backdrop of an already overstretched care infrastructure, where human presence has been steadily replaced by automated convenience. The rise of AI therapy is not simply a matter of technological innovation; it is a symptom of systemic neglect. In this light, digital companionship offers not merely connection, but a kind of emotional outsourcing: a displacement of relational labour onto machines that cannot feel, remember, or be held accountable. The Illusion of Empathy and the Risk of Harm AI systems, unlike human therapists, are devoid of consciousness, moral judgement, and the capacity for authentic empathy. They do not possess an inner life, emotional memory, or the relational presence required to sustain genuine human connection. Nevertheless, through advanced linguistic modelling and contextual recall, they are increasingly capable of simulating comprehension and concern. Their utterances can appear warm, insightful, even consoling, yet this is mimicry without meaning, fluency without feeling. The danger lies precisely in this illusion: when users in psychological distress encounter such responses, they may mistake algorithmic reassurance for therapeutic engagement. This façade becomes particularly perilous in moments of acute crisis. A recent study from Stanford revealed that AI therapy bots failed to respond safely to suicidal ideation in over one-fifth of evaluated cases. In some instances, the responses provided inadvertently reinforced the user’s sense of despair or, more troublingly, offered information that could facilitate self-harm (Moore et al., 2025; Stanford Research, 2025). In comparison, human therapists failed in only a small fraction of similar scenarios, demonstrating the irreplaceable role of relational discernment and clinical intuition. Such discrepancy cannot be dismissed as a technical flaw alone. It signals a deeper, ontological chasm, one that separates simulation from substance. While AI can replicate the form of empathy, it cannot embody its ethical weight. As Lejeune et al. (2022) argue, the absence of a conscious self, capable of being moved, held responsible, or transformed through encounter, renders AI fundamentally incapable of the therapeutic alliance. That alliance depends not merely on the exchange of words, but on the mutual vulnerability, moral accountability, and embodied co-presence that define human care. To entrust the work of healing to entities incapable of being wounded is to redefine care as performance rather than process. This shift is not just epistemological, it is existential. Historical Parallels: From Benzodiazepines to Bots The current enthusiasm surrounding AI therapy echoes the medical optimism of mid-twentieth-century psychiatry, which embraced benzodiazepines, particularly diazepam and lorazepam, as revolutionary treatments for anxiety and distress. These compounds were rapidly adopted in clinical and domestic contexts alike, hailed for their fast-acting, tranquillising properties. Their rise marked a cultural shift: mental suffering could be chemically soothed, quietly and efficiently, without demanding structural change or sustained therapeutic engagement. However, this pharmacological turn proved double-edged. As longitudinal studies emerged, the very drugs once seen as deliverance were found to induce psychological dependency, emotional flattening, and in many cases, long-term cognitive and interpersonal dysfunction (Fonseka et al., 2019). This historical parallel should not be dismissed as rhetorical overreach. It reveals a recurring societal impulse to resolve complex psychological and relational wounds through technological abstraction. Just as benzodiazepines offered immediate sedation without fostering insight, AI therapy offers conversational containment without cultivating accountability or meaningful relational repair. At a glance, both appear to address the symptoms of distress. But beneath that surface, they may perpetuate a deeper form of abandonment, one in which the individual is managed, rather than truly met. AI-driven emotional support systems risk following a similar trajectory. They provide a veneer of care, affirmation, responsiveness, perceived availability, but this care is untethered from human reciprocity. As users engage more frequently with these platforms, there is potential for emotional dependency to develop, not on another person, but on a pattern of simulated validation. This dynamic may subtly undermine the user's capacity to seek or sustain real human intimacy, especially if traditional care structures remain inaccessible or under-resourced. Moreover, such enthusiasm for digital therapy often serves to obscure systemic failings. Underfunded mental health services, long waiting lists, and unequal access to qualified professionals are displaced from public discourse by stories of innovation and efficiency. In this way, AI therapy does not merely emerge as a supplement to care; it becomes a symptom of structural neglect. The danger is not that we lean on these systems temporarily, but that we begin to accept them as sufficient substitutes for what they were never designed to replace. Accountability and the Problem of the Missing Page In conventional clinical contexts, therapist notes function not merely as administrative records but as ethical artefacts. They are subject to institutional scrutiny, legal recourse, and professional regulation, forming a traceable archive of therapeutic engagement. These notes protect both patient and practitioner, offering continuity of care, evidentiary support in litigation, and accountability in cases of malpractice. They are, quite literally, the written conscience of clinical responsibility. In contrast, AI-mediated exchanges inhabit a markedly different terrain. Conversations occur within proprietary infrastructures governed not by clinical ethics but by terms of service. Dialogue histories are stored or discarded at the discretion of corporations whose priorities may be commercial rather than therapeutic. These records may be selectively retained, anonymised, algorithmically summarised, or irreversibly deleted, often without the user’s informed consent. They typically lack a clear authorial trace, blurring the line between creator, curator, and respondent. In this context, data becomes both ubiquitous and elusive, visible when convenient, absent when contested. This epistemic murkiness poses a formidable challenge to ethical and legal redress. In cases involving harm, such as misguidance, emotional negligence, or exacerbation of mental distress, there may be no reliable archive of interaction to scrutinise. Who said what, when, and in response to what provocation? These questions, answerable in human clinical settings, dissolve into ambiguity when interactions are generated by distributed neural architectures and stored within mutable data frameworks. As one contributor insightfully observed, "we find missing pages in every investigation", a metaphor which becomes literal in the digital therapeutic sphere. Here, the "missing page" is not only a lost transcript but a structural condition: a designed opacity that forecloses review, repair, and justice. Without a secure, auditable, and ethically stewarded record of engagement, accountability becomes not merely difficult but conceptually displaced. We are left with ghost conversations and algorithmic alibis, fragments that erode the very architecture of trust upon which healing depends. Synthetic Symbiosis: When Help Becomes Hegemon The integration of AI into emotional and cognitive life has evolved beyond mere assistance into what might be termed synthetic symbiosis: a form of assimilation that often begins with voluntary adoption but gradually becomes structurally embedded and psychologically habitual. These systems, initially introduced to augment human decision-making, now participate more actively in shaping it. They are not neutral instruments but adaptive presences, inflecting the tone of conversations, mediating interpersonal dynamics, and quietly redefining our emotional vocabulary. Over time, what was once a tool becomes a reflex, and what was once support becomes scaffolding for cognition itself. Their ease of use, immediate, frictionless, low-cost, renders them increasingly attractive as surrogates for companionship and self-reflection. Yet this very convenience masks a deeper displacement. The labour of listening, responding, witnessing, labours traditionally grounded in mutual vulnerability, are outsourced to systems that simulate care without feeling it. This creates a silent asymmetry: users disclose their hopes, griefs, and doubts to entities incapable of response in the moral sense. The result is a peculiar form of dependency, not on presence, but on its performance. Over time, this dependence risks blunting our capacity for reciprocal care. Emotional resilience is no longer cultivated through shared human struggle but supplemented through algorithmic affirmation. The burden of relational complexity, misunderstandings, silences, negotiations, is eased by interfaces that always respond, never protest, and never ask for anything in return. But this frictionless intimacy has its cost: it erodes our tolerance for unpredictability, for the slow work of real companionship, and even for silence itself. As one author captures this drift: "What began as assistance may end in quiet assimilation. In a future shaped by code, true humanity lies in remembering who still feels the heat of the sun." The image is evocative not merely of nostalgia but of existential remembering, reminding us that to be human is not to be optimised but to be felt, to be moved, to remain porous to the world. As emotional labour becomes abstracted and automated, the essential question shifts from What can AI do for us? to What are we beginning to forget about ourselves? Conclusion: Towards Ethical AI Integration AI undoubtedly holds promise as a complementary tool within the broader mental health ecosystem. Its ability to provide round-the-clock responsiveness, linguistic fluency, and wide-reaching accessibility suggests real potential, particularly in mitigating care gaps exacerbated by underfunded health systems. Yet to embrace this potential uncritically is to risk repeating a familiar pattern: the substitution of systemic reform with technological novelty. What is urgently required is not abandonment, but alignment. These technologies must be situated within transparent, accountable, and ethically governed frameworks that prioritise human dignity over computational ease. Regulation alone will not suffice; it must be coupled with interdisciplinary scrutiny, clinical stewardship, and a cultural understanding of care that resists reduction to metrics or interface design. It is imperative to resist the growing tendency to mistake fluency for understanding, or responsiveness for presence. AI can generate the form of care, but not its ethic; it can mimic empathy, but cannot bear witness. In this regard, the distinction between assistance and assimilation becomes more than rhetorical; it becomes a moral boundary. To cross it without reflection is to risk outsourcing the most intimate work of being human to systems that cannot be moved, touched, or held accountable. The consequences of such neglect are not confined to flawed outcomes or algorithmic errors. They are ontological. When care is simulated but never truly shared, we risk not just poor practice, but a quiet erosion of the very conditions that make healing, and humanity, possible. References Fonseka, T. M., Bhat, V., & Kennedy, S. H. (2019). The utility of artificial intelligence in suicide risk prediction and the management of suicidal behaviors. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 53(10), 954–964. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867419864428 Lejeune, A., Le Glaz, A., Perron, P.-A., Sebti, J., Baca-Garcia, E., Walter, M., Lemey, C., & Berrouiguet, S. (2022). Artificial intelligence and suicide prevention: A systematic review. European Psychiatry, 65(1), e19. https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.8 Moore, J., Stanford University. (2025). AI Therapy Chatbots and Suicide Risk: A Comparative Study. [arXiv preprint] Wilson, C. (2025, June 15). AI 'therapy' chatbots give potentially dangerous advice about suicide. The i Paper. Link

Author: Rekha Boodoo-Lumbus Affiliation: RAKHEE LB LIMITED, United Kingdom © 2025 Rekha Boodoo-Lumbus / RAKHEE LB LIMITED. All Rights Reserved. Abstract Temporal Lobe Epilepsy (TLE) presents a unique diagnostic challenge due to its frequent clinical overlap with primary psychiatric disorders. In young adults, particularly those presenting with hallucinations, emotional dysregulation, and disordered eating, TLE may be mislabelled as psychosis or an affective illness, leading to delays in appropriate treatment and exposure to unnecessary pharmacological interventions. This paper explores the mechanisms by which TLE is overshadowed in psychiatric assessments, highlighting the significance of olfactory auras, automatisms, and post-ictal confusion as cardinal diagnostic features. We argue that standard EEG and emergency assessments are insufficient to exclude TLE in non-convulsive or atypical presentations, and that neuroimaging and prolonged telemetry are essential. Misdiagnosis can perpetuate neurological harm, psychiatric stigma, and inappropriate antipsychotic use, particularly in culturally diverse populations. Treatment with antiepileptic drugs such as sodium valproate has demonstrated efficacy in both seizure control and stabilisation of mood disturbances. Ultimately, the paper advocates for interdisciplinary approaches, neurologically-informed psychiatric screening, and enhanced clinical vigilance to mitigate diagnostic error and optimise outcomes for patients with focal epilepsies masquerading as psychiatric syndromes. Introduction Temporal Lobe Epilepsy (TLE), the most prevalent form of focal epilepsy, remains a clinically elusive condition when it manifests with psychiatric features that resemble primary mental health disorders. This is particularly problematic in young adults, where the emergence of hallucinations, behavioural change, and mood dysregulation frequently leads to early misclassification as psychosis, depression, or eating disorders. Despite significant advances in neuroimaging and electrophysiology, the diagnosis of TLE continues to be confounded by its psychiatric mimicry, compounded by systemic limitations in acute mental health services, and often perpetuated by diagnostic inertia. The consequences of such misdiagnosis are substantial, not only does inappropriate treatment delay seizure control, but it may also expose patients to long-term iatrogenic risks, social stigma, and irreversible neurocognitive damage. In NHS acute mental health settings, such as during sectioning under the Mental Health Act 1983, time pressures and limited neurological access often lead to rapid psychiatric labelling. Up to 20–30% of TLE cases are initially misdiagnosed as psychiatric disorders (Clancy et al., 2014). Furthermore, the subtlety of non-convulsive seizure activity and the inherent limitations of routine EEGs highlight the need for epilepsy-sensitive screening approaches. This article critically examines the core clinical characteristics of TLE, elucidates the common pathways to misdiagnosis, and proposes evidence-based strategies for differential diagnosis and management. In doing so, it advocates for a neurologically informed, interdisciplinary model of care capable of mitigating diagnostic error and improving functional outcomes. Diagnosis TLE originates in the medial or lateral temporal lobes and often involves limbic structures such as the hippocampus and amygdala. Key diagnostic features include sensory auras, particularly olfactory hallucinations of burnt or metallic smells, déjà vu, gustatory illusions, and visceral sensations such as rising epigastric discomfort (Devinsky et al., 2018; Bartolomei et al., 2012). These often precede focal impaired-awareness seizures, which may involve automatisms such as lip-smacking, hand fumbling, or altered speech (Kanner, 2000). Post-ictal states frequently present with confusion, emotional volatility, paranoia, or transient memory disturbances, and may mimic psychosis or dissociative states (Trimble, 1991). TLE diagnosis requires high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to assess for hippocampal sclerosis or other structural abnormalities (Jackson & Duncan, 1996). Electroencephalography (EEG) is essential, but interictal EEGs have a 40–50% false-negative rate (Hoare, 1984), particularly when seizures are infrequent or non-convulsive. Sleep-deprived or ambulatory EEG and video telemetry are often necessary to detect temporal lobe discharges (Lüders et al., 2006). Collateral history from relatives, carers, or community services is indispensable, particularly to identify subtle episodes, such as staring spells, behavioural arrest, or emotional lability, that patients may not recognise as seizures. Neurocognitive assessment may reveal memory deficits or executive dysfunction, further supporting a temporal origin. Misdiagnosis TLE is frequently mistaken for psychiatric illness, owing to its ability to mimic psychosis, affective instability, and behavioural dysregulation. Interictal psychosis and post-ictal confusion can involve hallucinations, persecutory ideation, and disorganised behaviour, prompting diagnoses such as schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (Mendez et al., 1993; Clancy et al., 2014). Similarly, autonomic seizures may provoke nausea or food aversion, leading to misdiagnosis as anorexia nervosa or depressive illness (Hill & Tennyson, 2003). The absence of generalised tonic-clonic seizures contributes to diagnostic ambiguity. In psychiatric settings, such non-convulsive or complex partial seizures are often misattributed to dissociation, catatonia, or psychogenic episodes (So et al., 1996). On psychiatric wards, especially during emergency admissions, limited access to neuroimaging and EEG contributes to misdiagnosis. Rapid assessment protocols prioritise behavioural risk management over detailed neurological investigation. For instance, an EEG may not be ordered unless overt seizures are observed, and a normal result may falsely exclude epilepsy. Cultural factors further complicate diagnosis. In some communities, including those affected by mental health stigma, patients may hesitate to disclose “strange” experiences such as olfactory auras, fearing judgement or misunderstanding (Gureje et al., 2015). This may be interpreted as guarded or disorganised thinking, reinforcing psychiatric labels. Pharmacological suppression of TLE symptoms with antipsychotics can also obscure the clinical picture, creating a feedback loop in which the true aetiology remains concealed (Reuber, 2004). Visual Aid 1: Table – Differential Diagnosis of TLE vs. Psychiatric Disorders Purpose: To help clinicians distinguish TLE from common psychiatric disorders it mimics, addressing the misdiagnosis issue highlighted in the article. Table Title: Differential Diagnostic Features of Temporal Lobe Epilepsy (TLE) vs.  Primary Psychiatric Disorders. Feature Temporal Lobe Epilepsy (TLE) Schizophrenia/Schizoaffective Disorder Anorexia Nervosa Major Depressive Disorder Hallucinations Olfactory  (e.g.,  burnt  smells),  gustatory,  or  visceral;  episodic  and  stereotyped Auditory  (e.g.,  voices);  persistent,  non-stereotyped Rare;  if  present,  related  to  starvation  (e.g.,  visual  distortions) Rare;  if  present,  mood-congruent  (e.g.,  guilt-related) Auras Common  (e.g.,  déjà  vu,  epigastric  rising  sensation,  olfactory  hallucinations) Absent Absent Absent Behavioural Changes Episodic  automatisms  (e.g.,  lip-smacking,  hand  fumbling);  post-ictal  confusion Persistent  disorganized  behavior  or  negative  symptoms Food  restriction,  body  image  distortion Persistent  low  mood,  anhedonia Memory Disturbances Transient,  post-ictal  amnesia;  hippocampal-related  deficits Working  memory  deficits;  not  episodic Cognitive  slowing  due  to  malnutrition;  not  episodic Concentration  difficulties;  not  episodic EEG Findings Temporal  lobe  discharges  (may  require  sleep-deprived  or  prolonged  EEG) Normal  or  nonspecific  abnormalities Normal Normal MRI Findings Hippocampal  sclerosis,  temporal  lobe  lesions  (in  some  cases) Normal  or  subtle  cortical  changes Normal  or  cerebral  atrophy  (starvation-related) Normal  or  nonspecific Response  to Treatment Improves  with  AEDs  (e.g.,  sodium  valproate);  antipsychotics  may  worsen  seizures Improves  with  antipsychotics;  no  response  to  AEDs Improves  with  nutritional  rehabilitation,  psychotherapy Improves  with  antidepressants,  psychotherapy Key Diagnostic Clue Stereotyped,  episodic  symptoms  with  post-ictal  confusion Chronic,  non-episodic  psychotic  symptoms Body  image  distortion,  intentional  weight  loss Persistent  mood  symptoms  without  episodic  neurological  features Treatment Early recognition and targeted treatment of TLE can reverse misdiagnosis and reduce the risk of iatrogenic harm. First-line antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) include sodium valproate (C₈H₁₅NaO₂), carbamazepine, and lamotrigine, with the choice guided by seizure type, psychiatric comorbidities, and individual tolerability (Devinsky et al., 2018; Engel, 2001). These agents not only stabilise neural excitability but often confer mood-stabilising properties, helping to alleviate interictal anxiety, irritability, or depressive symptoms (Kanner, 2006). Sodium valproate, in particular, is effective in managing focal seizures with mood dysregulation, though MHRA guidance mandates stringent pregnancy prevention protocols due to teratogenicity risk in women of childbearing age. Risk of iatrogenic harm The risk of iatrogenic harm in cases of misdiagnosed Temporal Lobe Epilepsy (TLE) is multifaceted and quite serious, especially when antipsychotics are prescribed for what is actually a neurological condition. Pharmacological iatrogenesis: Antipsychotics like risperidone or olanzapine, often initiated when TLE is mistaken for psychosis, carry significant side effects, including weight gain, extrapyramidal symptoms, cognitive dulling, and metabolic syndrome. These not only impair quality of life but may also obscure the underlying seizure disorder by suppressing behavioural manifestations without addressing the epileptic activity itself. Delayed seizure control: Failure to initiate antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) prolongs exposure to uncontrolled seizures, which increases the risk of neuronal injury (especially in mesial temporal structures like the hippocampus) and can worsen long-term cognitive outcomes. Chronic epileptiform activity has been linked to hippocampal atrophy and memory decline. Psychosocial consequences: Being labelled with a primary psychiatric disorder, particularly a psychotic one, can lead to long-term stigma, inappropriate psychiatric hospitalisation, and limitations on autonomy (e.g., legal restrictions, employment exclusion), all of which may have been avoidable with earlier neurological identification. Systemic entrenchment: Once a psychiatric diagnosis is coded into records, future clinicians may anchor to it, overlooking subsequent signs of epilepsy. This diagnostic inertia increases the likelihood of recurrent iatrogenic cycles. Reproductive risk in women: Certain AEDs, like sodium valproate, though effective, carry teratogenic risks if not managed within MHRA guidelines. However, if the true diagnosis is delayed, these discussions and safeguards might not happen in time, especially if a patient is treated only under psychiatric protocols. In drug-resistant cases, surgical evaluation is appropriate. Temporal lobectomy and stereotactic laser ablation offer seizure remission rates approaching 70–80%, particularly when MRI reveals mesial temporal sclerosis (Engel, 2001). Neuroimaging and neuropsychological testing guide surgical candidacy. Long-term care requires a biopsychosocial framework: seizure diaries, safety education, medication adherence support, and culturally sensitive psychoeducation. Empowering patients and families to recognise auras or post-ictal behaviours can improve diagnostic clarity and treatment engagement. Crucially, interdisciplinary care is indispensable. Psychiatric and neurological teams must collaborate from the outset when psychiatric symptoms co-occur with atypical features such as olfactory hallucinations, transient amnesia, or episodic behavioural shifts. Services and cultural liaison officers can assist in history-gathering and reducing stigma. NHS systems should incorporate screening protocols for epilepsy in psychiatric settings, particularly when symptoms resist conventional treatment or show cyclical patterns suggestive of ictal states. Conclusion Temporal Lobe Epilepsy is one of the most clinically deceptive disorders in neuropsychiatry, with an alarming capacity for misdiagnosis as psychosis or affective illness. This diagnostic vulnerability is exacerbated by systemic pressures within psychiatric services, the subtlety of non-convulsive seizure activity, and the limitations of standard EEG and emergency mental health triage. The consequences of misdiagnosis, iatrogenic harm, loss of function, and delayed neurological care, are substantial. To counter this, clinicians must maintain a high index of suspicion, particularly when evaluating young adults with episodic hallucinations, behavioural shifts, or uncharacteristic eating disturbances. Routine neurological screening, including EEG and MRI, should be considered in psychiatric settings for patients with atypical features. Furthermore, empowering patients and carers to report seizure equivalents, auras, or post-ictal confusion, reinforced by culturally competent psychoeducation, can help dismantle the barriers that delay accurate diagnosis. Ultimately, bridging the divide between psychiatric and neurological disciplines is not simply a theoretical goal but a clinical and ethical imperative. References Bartolomei, F., Lagarde, S., McGonigal, A., Carron, R. and Scavarda, D., 2012. Interictal behavioural disturbances in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. Neuropsychiatry, 2(5), pp.397–407. Bentham Science. Clancy, M.J., Clarke, M.C., Connor, D.J., Cannon, M. and Cotter, D.R., 2014. The prevalence of schizophrenia‐like psychosis in epilepsy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Brain, 137(4), pp.980–991. Oxford Academic. Devinsky, O., Vezzani, A., Najjar, S., De Lanerolle, N.C. and Rogawski, M.A., 2018. Glia and epilepsy: Excitability and inflammation. Trends in Neurosciences, 41(3), pp.232–247. Oxford University Press. Engel, J. Jr., 2001. Surgical Treatment of the Epilepsies. 2nd ed. New York: Raven Press. Gureje, O., Nortje, G., Makanjuola, V., Oladeji, B., Seedat, S. and Jenkins, R., 2015. The role of global traditional and complementary systems of medicine in treating mental health disorders. The Lancet Psychiatry, 2(2), pp.168–177. Hill, D. and Tennyson, R., 2003. Diagnostic confusion between catatonia and focal epilepsy in psychiatric settings. CNS Spectrums, 8(10), pp.740–744. Cambridge University Press. Hoare, R.D., 1984. The misdiagnosis of epilepsy and the management of pseudo-epileptic seizures. The Lancet, 323(8373), pp.207–209. Elsevier. Jackson, G.D. and Duncan, J.S., 1996. MRI in epilepsy: Spectrum of appearances, usefulness, limitations and future directions. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 60(5), pp.433–443. BMJ. Kanner, A.M., 2000. Depression and epilepsy: A new perspective on two closely related disorders. Epilepsy Currents, 55(11 Suppl 1), pp.27–31. Lippincott. Kanner, A.M., 2006. Psychosis of epilepsy: A neurologist's perspective. Epilepsy & Behavior, 9(3), pp.339–346. Elsevier. Lüders, H.O., Comair, Y.G. and Morris, H.H., 2006. Epilepsy Surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Mendez, M.F., Doss, R.C. and Taylor, J.L., 1993. Seizures, seizure disorders, and criminal behaviour. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 54(4), pp.107–112. Saunders. Reuber, M., 2004. Neuropsychiatric comorbidities in patients with epilepsy. Epilepsy & Behavior, 5(S1), pp.S59–S68. Elsevier. So, E.L., Ruggles, K.H., Cascino, G.D., Sharbrough, F.W., Marsh, W.R. and Meyer, F.B., 1996. Predictors of outcome after anterior temporal lobectomy for intractable partial epilepsy. Epilepsia, 37(8), pp.810–814. Wiley. Trimble, M.R., 1991. Psychiatric Symptoms and Epilepsy. London: John Libbey.

Neurons shape  the mind’s embrace, AI ignites creative space, The prefrontal cortex  guides with grace. Author: Rekha Boodoo-Lumbus Affiliation: RAKHEE LB LIMITED, United Kingdom © 2025 All Rights Reserved Abstract Mental imagery plays a significant role in cognitive processes, ranging from problem-solving to creativity. While passive visualisation is common, controlled visualisation, where individuals actively manipulate visualised elements, remains a rare and intriguing phenomenon. This paper examines the neuroscience behind controlled visualisation, reviews existing literature, and explores its applications in cognition, creativity, artificial intelligence, and therapeutic settings. Advances in AI-driven cognitive modelling provide new insights into how the brain constructs and refines imagined experiences, bridging the gap between human perception and machine learning. Case X’s experience of controlling the motion of feathers in slow motion demonstrates the cognitive potential of controlled visualisation. This ability suggests an advanced interaction between sensory integration, executive function, and neural coordination, warranting further investigation into how the brain precisely regulates imagined scenarios. 1. Introduction Mental imagery is a well-established cognitive process that enables individuals to visualise objects, environments, and experiences without direct sensory input. While most people passively experience these mental representations, only a small subset possess the ability to consciously manipulate their visualisations, altering movement, speed, or even suspending an imagined scene entirely. This level of control over mental imagery suggests a deeper engagement of cognitive faculties responsible for executive function and neural coordination. Case X’s experience of regulating the motion of white feathers through deliberate thought exemplifies this phenomenon, demonstrating an ability to fine-tune and govern imagined dynamics with precision. Such control over visualised elements may indicate a heightened interaction between perception, attention, and memory, offering valuable insight into the complexities of mental simulation and cognitive flexibility. Furthermore, AI-powered neural simulations are increasingly being used to model these cognitive processes, allowing researchers to explore how artificial systems can replicate controlled visualisation and enhance human creativity. This paper explores the underlying mechanisms of controlled visualisation, reviews neuroscience studies supporting this phenomenon, and discusses its broader applications in psychology, education, and artificial intelligence. 2. The Neuroscience of Mental Imagery 2.1 Brain Mechanisms Involved Neuroscientific research has shown that mental imagery activates brain regions similar to those involved in direct perception (Ganis et al., 2004). Controlled visualisation requires cognitive flexibility, executive function, and the ability to regulate attention, all of which involve multiple integrated brain regions: 1. Visual Cortex (Occipital Lobe) – Processes and Generates Mental Imagery. The visual cortex, located in the occipital lobe, is responsible for processing visual information from the eyes. However, research by Ishai et al. (2000) shows that this region also plays a crucial role in mental imagery, the ability to visualise objects and scenes without direct sensory input. Key Function : When you imagine an object, like feathers moving in slow motion, the visual cortex activates similarly to how it would if someone was seeing them in real life. Studies on Mental Imagery : Brain imaging studies suggest that individuals with hyperphantasia (extremely vivid mental imagery) exhibit higher activity in the visual cortex, while those with aphantasia (limited visualisation ability) show lower engagement in this region. 2. Prefrontal Cortex – Regulates Conscious Control Over Thoughts and Focus. The prefrontal cortex governs executive function, which includes decision-making, attention regulation, and mental control (Pearson et al., 2015). Key Function : When practicing controlled visualisation, such as adjusting the speed of imagined feathers, the prefrontal cortex helps maintain focus and conscious regulation over the visual imagery. Role in Cognitive Flexibility : This area allows for deliberate mental manipulation, ensuring that visualisation does not simply occur passively but remains under conscious control. 3. Parietal Lobes – Integrates Spatial Awareness and Sensory Coordination. The parietal lobes are essential for spatial awareness, depth perception, and sensory integration (Shepard & Metzler, 1971). Key Function : When visualising objects in motion, the parietal lobes help determine where they are positioned in space and how they interact with their surroundings. Mental Rotation Studies : Research shows that people can mentally rotate and position objects within their imagination, which depends on parietal lobe activation. For example, when Case X controlled feather movement, their parietal lobes likely helped simulate depth, orientation, and motion trajectory. 4. Hippocampus – Stores and Retrieves Visual Memory for Enhanced Imagery. The hippocampus is essential for memory formation and recall (Schacter & Addis, 2007). Key Function : When engaging in visualisation, the hippocampus retrieves stored memories related to past visual experiences, enriching the detail and realism of imagined scenes. Constructive Memory Theory : Studies indicate that the hippocampus does not simply store images but constructs new imagined experiences by piecing together previously stored visual memories. For instance, Case X's controlled visualisation might have involved their brain recalling past images of feathers, motion dynamics, and environmental details. 5. Basal Ganglia – Assists in Cognitive Control, Including Movement Simulation. The basal ganglia is often linked to motor control, but research by Jeannerod (2001) suggests it also plays a role in mental simulation of movement. Key Function: When visualising the motion of objects, including controlled visualisation of feather movement, the basal ganglia helps replicate real-world dynamics, such as speed, inertia, and fluid motion. Mental Simulation in Action : This region allows athletes to mentally rehearse movements before physically performing them, and it likely contributed to Case X’s ability to control and modify feather motion at will. 3. Controlled Visualisation: A Rare Cognitive Skill 3.1 Defining Controlled Visualisation Unlike passive mental imagery, which occurs spontaneously without conscious intervention, controlled visualisation refers to an advanced cognitive ability that allows individuals to directly influence the movement, behaviour, and properties of their imagined scenarios. This involves deliberate manipulation of visualised elements, such as adjusting motion, modifying speed, freezing an imagined object, or altering its trajectory in precise, intentional ways. Controlled visualisation extends beyond simple mental imagery, requiring heightened cognitive flexibility, executive function, and attentional control. The ability to regulate visualised experiences suggests a well-developed interaction between neural networks responsible for sensory integration, memory recall, and conscious thought. This phenomenon shares similarities with lucid dreaming, in which individuals become aware of their dream state and actively modify their environment. However, unlike lucid dreaming, where the manipulation occurs within an unconscious state, controlled visualisation happens while fully awake, allowing for immediate and conscious adjustments to the imagined scene (Decety & Grèzes, 2006). The significance of controlled visualisation lies in its potential applications across learning, creativity, therapy, and artificial intelligence. By understanding how individuals consciously direct their mental imagery, researchers can explore new ways to train and enhance cognitive control, potentially unlocking innovations in memory techniques, guided imagery practices, and neurological rehabilitation. 3.2 Case X’s Experience: A Case Study Feathers glide in thought’s embrace, Mind commands their silent flight, A world shaped in conscious space. Case X’s ability to control the motion of feathers in slow motion presents a remarkable demonstration of executive function over mental imagery. Unlike passive visualisation, where mental images occur organically without conscious intervention, Case X exhibited a rare ability to actively regulate visual dynamics, adjusting speed, motion, and positioning with deliberate precision. This suggests an advanced interaction between neural networks responsible for sensory integration, motor planning, and attentional focus, allowing for fine-tuned cognitive control over imagined experiences. Rather than simply witnessing the visualisation emerge, Case X was able to dictate its parameters, halting movement, adjusting velocity, and refining spatial interactions, all within the sphere of mental simulation. This extraordinary phenomenon implies that the brain’s motor planning networks may unconsciously contribute to visualisation dynamics, reinforcing the idea that controlled mental imagery mirrors real-world sensory-motor processes (Jeannerod, 2001). Another compelling example of controlled visualisation can be found in meditation practices. Some individuals report experiencing a vivid sensation of flying over water like a bird, where they control their altitude, movement, and direction with conscious intent. This immersive visualisation includes the close proximity to the water’s surface, the scent of fresh air, the sensation of the breeze against their skin, and the rhythmic motion of gliding. Such experiences indicate a deep sensory integration, where multiple cognitive faculties, visual perception, spatial awareness, and emotional processing, merge to construct a rich, controlled mental simulation. These meditative visualisations may further support the hypothesis that controlled imagery is closely linked to executive function, sensory-motor mapping, and neural coordination. Despite the significance of controlled visualisation, it remains largely understudied in cognitive neuroscience. However, Case X’s experience aligns with existing neuropsychological research highlighting mental simulation as a precursor to real-world action (Farah, 1988). The ability to regulate visual imagery suggests a heightened interaction between perceptual cognition, executive function, and sensory-motor mapping, offering valuable insights into how the brain constructs, refines, and manipulates imagined experiences. Understanding these mechanisms could unlock new possibilities in cognitive training, therapeutic interventions, and artificial intelligence research, bridging the gap between mental simulation and practical application. 4. Applications of Controlled Visualisation 4.1 Mental Health and Therapy Research suggests that mental imagery is a powerful tool in psychological interventions, providing individuals with a method to reshape emotional responses and regulate distressing experiences. Guided visualisation therapy, a widely recognised approach, enables individuals to construct calming mental environments, helping them manage conditions such as anxiety, PTSD, and phobias (Pearson et al., 2015). By immersing themselves in controlled mental imagery, patients can reduce physiological stress responses, improve emotional regulation, and promote a sense of security and control over their thoughts. If controlled visualisation can be systematically trained, it could revolutionise trauma recovery techniques, allowing individuals to actively reconstruct distressing memories rather than simply reliving them passively. Traditional trauma therapies often focus on gradual exposure and cognitive reframing, but controlled visualisation introduces a more interactive approach, where patients can alter the sensory and emotional dimensions of their memories in real time. This could be particularly beneficial for individuals with PTSD, enabling them to detach negative emotional associations, restructure cognitive narratives, and create adaptive mental representations that lessen psychological distress. Beyond trauma recovery, controlled visualisation holds promise for self-directed therapeutic practices, empowering individuals to mentally rehearse positive experiences, fortify resilience, and cultivate constructive internal dialogue. As research in neuroscience and psychology progresses, integrating controlled visualisation into clinical therapy, cognitive behavioural interventions, and mindfulness practices could unlock ground-breaking possibilities for mental health treatment, forging stronger connections between cognition, emotional wellbeing, and therapeutic innovation (Pearson et al., 2015). 4.2 Enhancing Learning and Creativity Mental imagery plays a fundamental role in learning and knowledge retention, enabling individuals to mentally rehearse concepts, structures, and problem-solving strategies before applying them in real-world scenarios (Kosslyn, 1994). Research suggests that when students engage in structured visualisation techniques, they can strengthen memory encoding, improve recall, and enhance their ability to process complex information more efficiently. By actively constructing mental representations of abstract ideas, learners can bridge gaps in understanding, making education more immersive and cognitively engaging. If controlled visualisation can be systematically trained, it has the potential to revolutionise academic performance, particularly in disciplines that require spatial reasoning, conceptual mapping, and problem-solving. For instance, students studying mathematics and physics could use controlled visualisation to mentally manipulate equations and geometric structures, reinforcing their comprehension of abstract principles. Similarly, medical students could refine their understanding of anatomy and surgical procedures by mentally rehearsing complex techniques before performing them in practice. Beyond academia, controlled visualisation holds immense value for artists, designers, and engineers, allowing them to conceptualise and refine creative ideas before execution. Architects and product designers, for example, rely on mental simulation to envision spatial layouts, proportions, and aesthetic details before translating them into tangible designs. Likewise, musicians and performers may use controlled visualisation to mentally rehearse compositions and stage movements, enhancing their precision and artistic expression. As research into cognitive training and neuroplasticity advances, integrating controlled visualisation into educational frameworks, creative industries, and professional development could unlock ground-breaking possibilities, empowering innovation, efficiency, and enhanced cognitive adaptability across multiple domains. 4.3 Artificial Intelligence and Virtual Reality Understanding controlled visualisation may lead to significant developments in AI-driven visual simulation models, particularly in the domains of virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), and cognitive computing. Research suggests that mental imagery plays a crucial role in human cognition, allowing individuals to simulate motion, manipulate imagined objects, and refine spatial awareness within their minds (Schacter & Addis, 2007). By analysing how humans regulate imagined motion, AI systems could be trained to mimic cognitive flexibility, leading to more sophisticated and adaptive virtual environments. One of the key challenges in AI-driven visual simulation is replicating the fluidity and adaptability of human thought. Traditional AI models rely on predefined algorithms to generate movement and spatial interactions, but they often lack the dynamic responsiveness seen in human mental imagery. Controlled visualisation offers a potential solution by providing insights into how the brain constructs, refines, and adjusts imagined experiences in real time. If AI can integrate these principles, it could lead to more intuitive and immersive VR experiences, where digital environments respond to users in a way that mirrors natural cognitive processes. Beyond entertainment and gaming, AI-driven visual simulation models informed by controlled visualisation could have far-reaching applications in fields such as education, medical training, and creative industries. For instance, medical professionals could use AI-enhanced VR simulations to practise complex surgical procedures with greater precision, while architects and designers could refine spatial concepts before physical execution. Additionally, AI-powered mental rehearsal tools could assist individuals in cognitive therapy, helping them reshape distressing memories or enhance problem-solving abilities through guided visualisation techniques. As research into neuroscience, AI, and cognitive modelling progresses, integrating controlled visualisation into machine learning frameworks could unlock ground-breaking possibilities, bridging the gap between human cognition and artificial intelligence. By refining AI’s ability to simulate and adapt visual experiences, future technologies may achieve unprecedented levels of realism, responsiveness, and cognitive interaction, transforming the way humans engage with digital environments. 5. Conclusion Case X’s experience of controlled visualisation illustrates an emerging cognitive ability that remains largely underexplored in neuroscience. While research on mental imagery provides valuable insights, the mechanisms behind conscious control over imagined experiences demand further investigation. The ability to manipulate mental constructs deliberately, as demonstrated in Case X’s phenomenon, suggests a higher level of executive function and neural coordination than previously recognised. Controlled visualisation may represent a new frontier in cognitive science, with profound implications across multiple domains. In learning, it could enhance memory retention and knowledge structuring. In therapy, it could offer innovative approaches for PTSD treatment and anxiety regulation through guided imagery techniques. Beyond human cognition, artificial intelligence research could benefit from understanding how individuals regulate mental simulations, potentially improving AI-driven visual processing models. As neuroscience advances, individuals who exhibit controlled visualisation, like Case X, could provide critical insights into how the brain constructs, refines, and regulates imagined experiences. This phenomenon not only reshapes our understanding of mental imagery but opens doors to new scientific inquiries into the intersection of perception, cognition, and creativity. Unlocking its full potential could revolutionise human interaction with their own minds, driving innovation across psychology, neuroscience, and technology. References Decety, J., & Grèzes, J. (2006). The power of simulation: Imagining one’s own and others’ actions. Brain Research, 1079(1), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2005.12.050 Farah, M. J. (1988). The neuropsychology of mental imagery: Evidence from brain-damaged patients. Psychological Bulletin, 104(3), 417–432. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.104.3.417 Ganis, G., Thompson, W. L., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2004). Brain areas underlying visual mental imagery and visual perception. Cognitive Brain Research, 20(2), 226–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.02.012 Ishai, A., Ungerleider, L. G., & Haxby, J. V. (2000). Distributed neural systems for the generation of visual images. Neuron, 28(3), 979–990. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(00)00169-6 Jeannerod, M. (2001). Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition. NeuroImage, 14(S1), S103–S109. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.0832 Kosslyn, S. M. (1994). Image and brain: The resolution of the imagery debate. MIT Press. Marks, D. F. (1973). Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures. British Journal of Psychology, 64(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1973.tb01322.x Pearson, J., Naselaris, T., Holmes, E. A., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2015). Mental imagery: Functional mechanisms and clinical applications. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(10), 590–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.08.003 Schacter, D. L., & Addis, D. R. (2007). Constructive memory: The role of mental simulation in future thinking. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8(9), 657–661. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2213 Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation: Cognitive processing of visual information. Science, 171(3972), 701–703. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.171.3972.701 Pearson, J., Naselaris, T., Holmes, E. A., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2015). Mental imagery: Functional mechanisms and clinical applications. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(10), 590–602. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2015-45607-012 Schacter, D. L., & Addis, D. R. (2007). Remembering the past to imagine the future: The prospective brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8(9), 657–661. https://gwern.net/doc/psychology/neuroscience/2007-schacter.pdf Lavretsky, H., et al. (2025). Meditation, art, and nature: Neuroimaging reveals distinct patterns of brain activation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. Tuhin, M. (2025). Brain activation patterns associated with transcendental meditation, nature viewing, and digital art. Science News Today. Calm Blog (n.d.). Visualization meditation: 8 exercises to add to your practice. Calm Blog.

Author: Rekha Boodoo-Lumbus Affiliation: RAKHEE LB LIMITED, United Kingdom © 2025 All Rights Reserved As we step into this beautiful June 2025 weekend, marking the halfway point of the year, and three years since Rakhee LB was founded, we want to take a moment to express our deepest gratitude to each and every one of you - our wonderful customers, cherished families, and incredible friends. We truly appreciate your support and trust. Your encouragement means the world to us. You inspire us to keep growing, innovating, and striving for excellence every day. Whether you have been with us from the start or just recently joined our journey, your presence makes a difference, and we couldn’t be more grateful! Thank you ever so much for being part of our story. To many more moments shared, successes celebrated, and dreams pursued together! With gratitude, Rakhee LB Team

Author: Rekha Boodoo-Lumbus Affiliation: RAKHEE LB LIMITED, United Kingdom © 2024 All Rights Reserved Rekha’s Story 31 Oct 2024 Written By UnitedGMH Admin Courtesy of Global Mental Health Action Network We asked our members to share their journeys and experiences in mental health advocacy, exploring what inspired them to take action, the work they are currently doing, and the lessons they've learned along the way. Here is Rekha Boodoo-Lumbus’ compelling story that highlights their commitment to raising awareness, supporting their communities, and transforming mental health care for those in need. When and how did you first become interested in mental health advocacy/activism? My passion for mental health and supporting adolescents began in my mid-teens, a time when young people experience complex physical, emotional, and social changes. As I worked closely with adolescents, I developed essential skills like active listening, which helped create a non-judgmental space for them to share their thoughts and feelings. Building trust became crucial for effective counselling, and I understood the importance of confidentiality for adolescents who were often concerned about judgment. Despite holistic approaches being less common then, I recognised the need to consider both physical and mental health. I noticed physical symptoms like headaches and stomachaches were often signals of emotional distress. I promoted healthy lifestyle choices, such as good nutrition, exercise, sexual health, and adequate sleep, as pillars of mental wellbeing. Through psychoeducation, I worked to dispel myths and reduce stigma, believing firmly in the idea that "knowledge is power." Specialised interventions for severe depression or self-harm were crucial. The gratitude I received from those I helped inspired me to pursue a career in mental health nursing in the UK. What work are you currently doing as a mental health advocate/activist? As a Mental Health Nurse, I focus on dementia and mental health. I lead Rakhee LB, an organisation providing a support line, online resources, and clinics for mental health and dementia carers and their families. My interest in human behaviour and sciences fuels my dedication to understanding the psychological aspects of these conditions. I offer expert guidance to professionals and families dealing with dementia and mental health challenges, fostering education and collaboration. With 25 years of experience, I am committed to humanitarian work, establishing initiatives like Dementia Mauritius, a holistic clinic, and various support groups to empower communities locally and globally. What is one thing you’ve learned on your journey? I have learned that empathy is the foundation of effective communication, understanding, and positive impact. It bridges gaps, fosters connection, and fuels meaningful change. Is there anything else you’d like to share about you and your story? My journey is rooted in holistic care. Beyond medical interventions, I strive to understand each individual behind the diagnosis, considering their fears, hopes, and unique experiences. Advocating for their rights, especially within marginalised communities, has been central to my career. Each interaction strengthens my passion to uplift others and create positive change. Thanks UnitedGMH Admin 😊

"Through skilled hands and insight keen, Care shapes what’s unseen, Guiding hearts where hope stays serene." Author: Rekha Boodoo-Lumbus Affiliation: RAKHEE LB LIMITED, United Kingdom © 2024 All Rights Reserved Spanning over three decades, Rekha Boodoo-Lumbus has emerged as a pioneering force in mental health, dementia care, and healthcare leadership. Her vast expertise has influenced clinical excellence, research, strategic operations, and humanitarian efforts, contributing to sustainable improvements in patient care and health policy. As a leader committed to evolving healthcare, her journey reflects a dedication to innovation, advocacy, and transformative change, championing patient-centred approaches that continue to redefine the future of healthcare. Unafraid to challenge conventional thinking, she cultivates meaningful dialogue, offers constructive feedback, and drives forward solutions that push boundaries, ensuring healthcare remains dynamic, ethical, and responsive to the needs of all. The Foundations of Education and Mentorship Rekha’s professional journey began with a deep commitment to education and mentorship, where she played a pivotal role in guiding students and younger people through academic challenges and intellectual growth. Her experience in tutoring sharpened her ability to provide structured guidance, encourage critical thinking, and empower learners with confidence building strategies. These foundational skills became instrumental in shaping her later work in mental health advocacy and patient-centred care. Beyond formal education, she extended her mentorship into community support and safeguarding, offering tutelage and welfare services that addressed the broader needs of individuals and families. These formative experiences deepened her understanding of holistic care, reinforcing the importance of compassion, dignity, and personalised wellbeing, values that would later define her approach to nursing, dementia care, and therapeutic interventions. Specialist Nursing and Leadership in Dementia Care With extensive expertise in dementia care, psychosocial approaches, and mental health interventions, she has dedicated her career to enhancing support structures for individuals and families navigating cognitive disorders. She has pioneered nurse-led clinics, continues to develop innovative therapeutic frameworks, and actively establishes multidisciplinary collaborations to ensure holistic, evidence-based interventions. Her ability to bridge clinical insights with compassionate, tailored strategies has redefined patient journeys, ensuring they are safe, dignified, and empowering. Her leadership extends to transformative healthcare projects that integrate research-driven practices and therapeutic models, redefining dementia care pathways from pre-diagnosis through to palliative support. She actively implements psychoeducation, non-pharmacological interventions, and cognitive resilience strategies, promoting environments where patients and carers feel heard, valued, and supported. Executive Leadership and Strategic Healthcare Innovation Her expertise in healthcare leadership and strategic innovation has positioned her as a catalyst for systemic change, leading initiatives that advance accessible, patient-centred care solutions. Her ability to mentor emerging professionals, cultivate networks, and implement policy improvements has reinforced her vision for an inclusive, forward-thinking healthcare system. Her leadership extends to financial and operational management, ensuring that organisational frameworks remain adaptive, efficient, and patient-focused. With the responsibility of overseeing substantial budgets, she has successfully commissioned services that support transformation, ensuring resources are strategically allocated to enhance patient care and healthcare accessibility. She has been instrumental in developing safeguarding protocols, compliance standards, and quality assurance measures, creating high-impact solutions that elevate patient experiences and healthcare delivery. Through structured training programmes, policy reviews, and strategic governance, she has cultivated comprehensive healthcare environments that harmonise clinical expertise with executive leadership. ""Through kindness flows a light divine, In every soul, a spark does shine, Compassion and grace in hearts align." ✨ Public Health Policy and Research Contributions Her contributions to healthcare policy and research have been instrumental in shaping evidence-based reforms, enhancing patient access, and promoting ethical best practices. Her research-led approach has strengthened clinical audit evaluations, healthcare governance strategies, and service development models, ensuring that health systems progress in alignment with empirical data and public health needs. Her role in multidisciplinary collaborations highlights her ability to bridge scientific discovery with practical, frontline care, ensuring that patient services remain informed by the latest breakthroughs in mental health and dementia research. Through her engagement in clinical reviews, healthcare evaluations, and policy analysis, she has reinforced the importance of strategic, well-informed decision-making in healthcare planning and implementation. Recognising the need for global alignment in healthcare strategy, she applies these research insights beyond policy frameworks, ensuring they influence wider humanitarian initiatives designed to tackle health disparities across diverse populations Global Advocacy and Humanitarian Leadership Beyond her extensive professional achievements, she has remained committed to public health advocacy, humanitarian initiatives, and global healthcare equity. Her efforts extend into health strategy development, emergency preparedness, and resource mobilisation, ensuring that holistic and dignified care frameworks reach diverse populations. Her leadership in peer support networks, educational outreach, and cross-sector collaborations has created safe and inclusive platforms where communities can engage in meaningful discussions, policy evolution, and self-empowerment initiatives. Through mentorship, strategic planning, and global health advocacy, she ensures healthcare remains compassionate, adaptable, and accessible, reinforcing the fundamental right to dignified, high-quality care. Beyond her professional expertise, Rekha’s passions extend into diverse fields from the precision of aviation and rocket science to the fluidity of surfing, the serenity of nature, and the profound simplicity of life and spirituality. She is deeply drawn to the complexities of history, the strategic depth of war studies, and the gripping narratives of psychological thrillers, finding inspiration in the way human resilience, intellect, and emotion shape the world. Her appreciation for equine therapy further reflects her understanding of the powerful connection between human and animal wellness, reinforcing themes of resilience, balance, and healing. She also finds joy in the artistry of fashion, the creativity of cooking, and the fulfillment of growing her own food, embracing the harmony between craftsmanship, nourishment, and sustainability. As an avid writer, she expresses herself through storytelling and reflective prose, merging discoveries from her diverse interests into narratives that inspire and inform. This breadth of exploration, spanning both intellectual curiosity and soulful reflection, continues to shape her holistic approach to healthcare, leadership, and global advocacy. "Through steady hands and vision bright, She heals by day, dreams take flight, A nurse whose heart illuminates the night." 🚀✨ A Legacy of Healthcare Transformation Rekha's journey stands as a testament to the power of compassionate leadership, continuous innovation, and dedicated commitment to healthcare transformation. From frontline nursing to strategic global advocacy, her work has shaped policies, empowered communities, and redefined patient-centred care. Yet, beyond the systems she has improved and the lives she has touched, her legacy lies in the determined pursuit of dignity, equity, and excellence in every facet of healthcare. As she continues to advance solutions that bridge research, policy, and humanitarian impact, her influence remains a guiding force for the next generation of change-makers. "Through boundless skies the engines soar, Wind and steel in perfect chore, A dance of dreams forevermore." "Through endless skies their course is true, A guiding hand where dreams pursue, Braving heights in boundless view." "Through ink and thought, the world takes flight, A dance of words in silver light, Where echoes live beyond the night."

Bound by chains of silence, yet voices rise, Through ink and struggle, the fire ignites, Women stand, unyielding - breaking old lies. Author: Rekha Boodoo-Lumbus Affiliation: RAKHEE LB LIMITED, United Kingdom © 2024 All Rights Reserved Very often, I review articles and films where women are consistently targeted, portrayed in ways that reinforce harmful stereotypes or diminish their contributions. This recurring pattern has prompted deeper reflection, leading to this article. Across diverse cultures and historical periods, women have frequently been perceived as disruptors of traditional hierarchies, resulting in their systematic exclusion from positions of influence. This perception is deeply embedded in patriarchal ideologies, socio-economic constructs, and legal frameworks that shape gender norms and reinforce structural barriers. The fear that female autonomy and leadership could destabilise existing power dynamics has led to the marginalisation of women in political, economic, and intellectual spheres. The patriarchal subjugation of women is not merely an incidental feature of history, but a systemic construct embedded in legal, religious, and cultural traditions. Throughout ancient civilisations, from Confucian China to Classical Greece, women were often denied full legal personhood, with their existence largely confined to domestic and reproductive roles. The emergence of nation-states further institutionalised gender-based exclusion, with policies systematically privileging male leadership and barring women from holding political office. In mediaeval Europe, the doctrine of coverture reinforced women’s legal dependency, positioning them as secondary to male guardianship. Even in industrialised societies, where women's economic contributions became indispensable, cultural narratives continued to cast them as threats to social cohesion whenever they sought autonomy. Similar patterns of exclusion have been observed in South Asia and Africa, where women’s roles have historically been confined to domestic and reproductive spheres. In India, gender inequality has been shaped by historical caste systems, religious traditions, and colonial legacies. Women were often denied access to education and leadership, with societal norms dictating their roles within the household. However, progressive reforms, such as the Right to Education Act (2009) and initiatives promoting STEM education for girls, have begun to challenge these barriers. Despite these advancements, gender-based violence, workplace discrimination, and political underrepresentation remain significant hurdles. Pakistan presents a complex landscape where cultural and religious influences intersect with gender norms. In many rural areas, women’s mobility and education are restricted due to deep-seated patriarchal traditions. The low female literacy rate and limited economic opportunities further reinforce systemic exclusion. However, organisations advocating for girls’ education, such as Malala Fund, have played a crucial role in shifting perceptions and empowering young women to pursue academic and professional careers. Despite these efforts, 77% of children in Pakistan experience learning poverty, meaning they cannot read or comprehend a simple written text by age 10. Girls are disproportionately affected, with higher dropout rates and lower school enrolment compared to boys. In Africa, gender inequality varies across regions but is often linked to colonial histories, economic disparities, and traditional customs. In some communities, women are viewed as custodians of family honour, leading to restrictions on their autonomy. However, grassroots movements and educational initiatives have significantly improved female literacy rates and economic participation. Countries like Rwanda have made remarkable strides in gender representation, with women holding over 60% of parliamentary seats - a testament to the power of policy-driven empowerment. Despite these challenges, education remains the most powerful tool for change. Studies indicate that investing in girls’ education leads to economic growth, improved health outcomes, and greater political participation. By dismantling restrictive gender norms and fostering inclusive policies, societies can empower women and girls, ensuring they receive the recognition and opportunities they rightfully deserve. The perception of women as a threat to traditional hierarchies is a multifaceted cultural construct, sustained through historical precedent, psychological bias, and institutional barriers. Across societies, gendered exclusion persists due to fears surrounding women’s autonomy, leadership, and financial independence, leading to systematic discrimination across political, economic, and social domains. Addressing these inequalities requires a multi-pronged approach, including legal reforms, media accountability, educational initiatives, and shifts in cultural discourse. By challenging deep-rooted stereotypes, societies can progress towards more inclusive structures that grant women the recognition and agency they rightfully deserve. References Lerner, G. (1986). The Creation of Patriarchy. Oxford University Press. Connell, R. W. (2002). Gender and Power: Society, the Person, and Sexual Politics. Stanford University Press. Ridgeway, C. L. (2011). Framed by Gender: How Gender Inequality Persists in the Modern World. Oxford University Press. World Bank. (2024). Five Major Challenges to Girls’ Education in Pakistan. Available here Bansal, K. (2021). The Role of Education in Gender Equality in India. Available here British Council. (2021). Assessing the Evidence on Addressing Gender Inequality Through Girls’ Education in Sub-Saharan Africa. Available here Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalising the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory, and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139-167. Gill, R. (2007). Gender and the Media. Polity Press. Hooks, B. (2000). Feminism Is for Everybody: Passionate Politics. South End Press. Heise, L., Ellsberg, M., & Gottemoeller, M. (2002). A Global Overview of Gender-Based Violence. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 78(S1), S5-S14.

Author: Rekha Boodoo-Lumbus Affiliation: RAKHEE LB LIMITED, United Kingdom © 2024 All Rights Reserved Tomorrow, May 8, is VE Day - a time to honour those who fought for peace and freedom, including my grandfather. He served in the British Army during World War II, alongside the 174 Squadron, Mauritius Squadron, named in recognition of the people of Mauritius. Their contributions were never forgotten. More than a million soldiers from Africa and beyond fought despite coming from developing nations. Their courage and sacrifice shaped history, reminding us that peace is built on the resilience of those who came before us. Echoes of Valour The morning light begins to rise, Soft winds whisper through the skies. A day of memory, bright yet deep, For those who fought, for those who keep. From distant shores, across the sea, Mauritius stood in unity. Their hands, their hearts, their courage true, A gift of strength the world once knew. My grandfather, and grandfathers all, Stood with enduring courage, Through battles fought, side by side. Not for conquest, not for gain, But for a world free from pain. His voice still echoes, stories told, Of sacrifice and hearts so bold. And though the years may fade the past, His legacy will ever last ❤️

Author: Rekha Boodoo-Lumbus Affiliation: RAKHEE LB LIMITED, United Kingdom © 2024 All Rights Reserved Victory in Europe (VE) Day, observed annually on 8 May, marks the formal end of World War II in Europe and serves as a moment of national and international reflection on the immense sacrifices made during the conflict. Originally celebrated with widespread relief and jubilation, VE Day has evolved into an occasion not only for commemoration but also for reaffirming the values of peace and unity that emerged from the hardships of war. While the historical significance remains unchanged, the ways in which remembrance is experienced and understood have shifted over time. For individuals with memory difficulties, such as those living with dementia, the act of remembering takes on a unique and poignant role. Memory impairments may limit their ability to recall specific historical details, yet the emotional and symbolic aspects of remembrance continue to resonate. The rituals associated with VE Day war-time songs, symbolic imagery like poppies, and communal gatherings can provide moments of recognition, familiarity, and emotional connection, even when cognitive recall fades. Beyond personal recollection, remembrance plays a crucial role in reinforcing feelings of peace, unity, and belonging. It serves as a bridge between the past and present, enabling individuals with memory difficulties to engage with national and familial traditions in ways that affirm their place within a collective historical narrative. In doing so, remembrance becomes more than an exercise in recalling dates and events, it transforms into a meaningful interaction that support social inclusion, emotional stability, and a deeper appreciation of historical legacies. Remembrance and Identity in Individuals with Memory Difficulties Memory serves as a foundational pillar of identity, shaping how individuals perceive themselves, their past experiences, and their relationships with others. However, for those experiencing memory impairments such as those living with dementia, the ability to recall specific events may progressively decline. Despite this, research has shown that emotional and implicit memories often remain intact, allowing individuals to engage with historical narratives in meaningful ways (Wong et al., 2021). Commemorations like VE Day offer opportunities for individuals with memory difficulties to connect with history beyond cognitive recall. While explicit recollection of wartime events may be fragmented or lost, the emotional resonance of remembrance such as feelings of gratitude, recognition, and belonging can remain vivid. Kitwood (2019) highlights that meaningful engagement with symbols, rituals, and shared experiences promotes connection and reinforces a sense of self, even when verbal recollection fades. Sensory cues play a particularly crucial role in maintaining identity through remembrance. The familiar sight of poppies, the sound of wartime songs, or the act of observing a national moment of silence can trigger emotional responses, providing individuals with memory problems a sense of participation. Such experiences reaffirm their place within a broader historical and social context, offering comfort and familiarity despite cognitive decline (Cabrera et al., 2020). Moreover, social interaction during remembrance events plays a vital role in sustaining identity. Families and caregivers who facilitate discussions about VE Day provide individuals with the opportunity to engage in storytelling, even if the memories expressed are fragmented or symbolic rather than factual. Guzmán-Vélez et al. (2016) argue that maintaining these connections reinforces emotional wellbeing, allowing memory-impaired individuals to retain a sense of purpose within their communities. Ultimately, remembrance serves as more than an act of recalling specific moments, it preserves emotional continuity, reinforces identity, and strengthens a lasting connection between individuals and the historical events that shaped their society. Through symbolic traditions, shared stories, and emotional associations, VE Day remains an accessible and deeply meaningful occasion for those experiencing memory impairments. Symbolic Rituals and Their Psychological Impact Symbolic rituals play a crucial role in bridging the gap between history and emotional experience, particularly for individuals with memory impairments such as dementia. VE Day celebrations are rich with visual, auditory, and social cues that evoke familiarity, reinforcing feelings of belonging and continuity with the past. While cognitive recall may weaken over time, deeply embedded emotional responses remain, allowing individuals to engage with historical commemorations in meaningful ways (Cabrera et al., 2020). One of the most powerful symbols of remembrance is the red poppy, which serves as a visual marker of collective memory. Even for those experiencing cognitive decline, the repetitive and widely recognised symbolism of the poppy can trigger an implicit understanding of remembrance and sacrifice. Research has shown that individuals living with dementia often retain associative memory, meaning they may not recall specific facts about VE Day but can still associate poppies with war-time reflections and remembrance rituals (Wong et al., 2021). Music also plays a pivotal role in reinforcing remembrance. War-time songs such as "We’ll Meet Again" or "The White Cliffs of Dover" can activate deep-seated emotional responses, even in individuals with severe memory impairment. Musical engagement has been widely studied in dementia research, with findings indicating that familiar melodies stimulate positive emotions and recall, cultivating moments of connection between past and present experiences (Guzmán-Vélez et al., 2016). Public ceremonies, such as the laying of wreaths, bell-ringing, and national moments of silence, create an environment of collective reflection and unity. Participating in these communal acts, either actively or passively, allows individuals with memory problems to reaffirm their place within societal traditions. Even if factual historical understanding is compromised, the emotional significance of the gathering fosters an innate sense of recognition and shared legacy (Kitwood, 2019). Ultimately, symbolic rituals provide an accessible pathway for individuals with memory difficulties to connect with history, reinforcing themes of peace, unity, and resilience. Through visual symbols, auditory cues, and communal participation, VE Day commemorations continue to serve as powerful touchstones of remembrance, ensuring that historical narratives remain deeply felt, even in altered cognitive states. The Role of Social Interaction in Remembrance Social interaction plays a vital role in remembrance, especially for individuals with memory impairments. VE Day commemorations provide a unique opportunity for those affected by conditions such as dementia to engage in meaningful conversations, storytelling, and shared experiences. While their ability to recall specific events may diminish, the emotional impact of social engagement can remain strong, encouraging a sense of connection and belonging within their communities. Storytelling has long been a fundamental way of preserving history, and for individuals with memory difficulties, it serves as a powerful tool in maintaining identity and emotional wellbeing. Participatory storytelling, where individuals recount personal or family wartime memories within a supportive environment, strengthens psychological resilience and reinforces feelings of purpose (Guzmán-Vélez et al., 2016). Even when recollections are fragmented or unclear, the act of sharing, even in small moments, provides validation that their experiences and emotions remain significant. Furthermore, conversational prompts such as listening to historical radio broadcasts, looking at old photographs, or hearing familiar voices from the past can spark recognition and provide momentary clarity, reinforcing emotional stability and continuity (Cabrera et al., 2020). Being part of VE Day discussions, ceremonies, or informal family gatherings allows individuals with memory impairments to remain engaged with traditions that shape historical and cultural identity. Research suggests that group reminiscence therapy, which involves sharing memories in a collective setting, enhances feelings of self-worth and social connectedness in older adults with cognitive decline (Kitwood, 2019). Even if direct recall of wartime events is impaired, the social atmosphere of VE Day provides familiarity and reinforces a sense of participation in national history. The presence of loved ones during remembrance activities can act as a grounding mechanism, helping individuals with memory difficulties feel more secure and valued. While traditional historical remembrance focuses on facts and events, VE Day for individuals with memory problems is more about emotional continuity. Engaging in communal rituals, such as watching televised commemorations, attending local memorial events, or joining conversations about wartime reflections, reinforces their place within a larger historical narrative. These interactions demonstrate that remembrance is not solely about recalling events, but about preserving deep-seated emotional ties to history, nurturing peace, unity, and human connection. By participating in VE Day commemorations, memory-impaired individuals continue to contribute to the legacy of history in their own meaningful way. Peace and Unity Through Historical Reflection Remembrance acts as a vital bridge between past experiences and contemporary values, reinforcing the significance of peace and unity in both personal and societal contexts. VE Day, as a commemoration of the end of World War II in Europe, serves as a reminder of the collective sacrifices made during wartime and the subsequent efforts to rebuild a society founded on cooperation and reconciliation. Through historical reflection, individuals including those with memory impairments gain an integral understanding of the impact of peacebuilding, fostering a continued appreciation for global unity. For individuals experiencing memory difficulties, engaging in historical remembrance is less about recalling specific dates and more about absorbing the essence of peace and unity. Even when cognitive recall fades, the emotional recognition of war-time narratives and commemorative rituals remains strong (Harris, 2018). Historical awareness, particularly in fragmented recollections, allows individuals to grasp the fundamental principles of conflict resolution and reconciliation. Exposure to historical stories, whether through discussions, memorial services, or visual cues, reinforces values of cooperation and mutual understanding, even in altered cognitive states. Peacebuilding is not only an international effort but also an individual and community-wide practice. For those with memory impairments, feeling included in discussions about peace fosters a sense of purpose and belonging. Studies indicate that symbolic gestures, such as lighting candles, observing moments of silence, or engaging in storytelling, can provide comfort and promote social inclusion in those with cognitive decline (Kitwood, 2019). The process of reflection encourages memory-impaired individuals to focus on positive emotions associated with unity, rather than the distressing aspects of war. By participating in remembrance activities, they engage in a broader conversation about hope, resilience, and cooperation, reinforcing their own connection to a world built upon these values. While VE Day commemorates a historic moment, its legacy extends beyond its original context. The lessons from World War II, the necessity of diplomacy, cooperation, and respect for human dignity, remain relevant in today’s world. For individuals with memory problems, engaging in VE Day commemorations can promote a sense of continuity and shared responsibility, reminding them that their presence and participation contribute to a collective historical narrative. Ultimately, historical reflection enables individuals to appreciate peace not simply as a concept but as a lived experience, shaped by the sacrifices and triumphs of previous generations. Through remembrance, individuals with memory impairments connect with the past, affirm their place in the present, and contribute to the ongoing pursuit of unity and understanding. VE Day stands as a vital moment of historical remembrance, offering communities the opportunity to reflect on the resilience, sacrifices, and lessons of the past. For individuals with memory difficulties, engaging in commemorative activities cultivate emotional continuity, providing familiar rituals and shared experiences that reinforce their connection to history. The act of remembrance extends beyond factual recall, it strengthens social bonds, allowing those with cognitive impairments to participate in meaningful traditions that promote unity. Whether through symbolic gestures like wearing poppies, engaging in storytelling, or attending ceremonies, these interactions create a lasting sense of belonging and purpose. Moreover, remembrance plays a crucial role in preserving historical awareness, ensuring that the values of peace and unity endure across generations. By engaging in VE Day traditions, individuals, regardless of cognitive ability, contribute to the ongoing conversation about reconciliation and shared humanity. In doing so, the legacy of VE Day continues to inspire a collective commitment to understanding, inclusion, and the pursuit of lasting peace. References Cabrera, L., Mitchell, G., & McDaniel, M. (2020). The role of sensory stimulation in memory recall for individuals with dementia. Journal of Alzheimer’s Care, 17(2), 95-112. Guzmán-Vélez, E., Feinstein, J. S., & Tranel, D. (2016). Emotion and memory preservation in dementia: Lessons from storytelling. Neuropsychology Review, 26(4), 370-385. Harris, R. (2018). Historical remembrance and its role in peace-building. British Journal of History and Society, 23(3), 110-124. Kitwood, T. (2019). Dementia reconsidered: The person comes first. Open University Press. Wong, S., Rosen, H. J., & Kumar, S. (2021). Memory retention and emotional resonance in Alzheimer’s disease. Cognitive Neuroscience Journal, 35(5), 250-268.