Manipulative behaviour can be subtle yet profoundly impactful on one's mental health. It often involves actions designed to control or influence others for personal gain, creating a toxic environment that can be emotionally draining. Such behaviour often includes sending mixed signals, seeking attention, and projecting insecurity. These individuals may use social media to seek validation and reassurance, often at the expense of others' emotional wellbeing. Dysfunctional situational dynamics can also play a significant role, where members of a particular group may unconsciously support or encourage such actions.
The prefrontal cortex is responsible for executive functions, such as decision-making, impulse control, and social behaviour. Dysfunction in this area can lead to poor judgment and manipulative behaviour (Miller & Cohen, 2001). The amygdala plays a pivotal role in processing emotions, particularly fear and aggression. Overactivity in the amygdala can result in heightened emotional responses and manipulative tactics to manage perceived threats (LeDoux, 2000). The insula is involved in emotional awareness and empathy. Reduced activity in the insula has been linked to a lack of empathy, which is often seen in manipulative individuals (Craig, 2009). The salience network, which includes the anterior insula and anterior cingulate cortex, helps prioritise stimuli and manage attention. Alterations in this network can lead to an increased focus on self-serving behaviours (Seeley et al., 2007).
According to John Bowlby's attachment theory, early relationships with carers shape an individual's ability to form healthy relationships later in life. Insecure attachment styles, such as anxious or avoidant attachment, can lead to manipulative behaviour as individuals seek to fulfill unmet emotional needs (Bowlby, 1988). Individuals with Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) often exhibit manipulative behaviour to maintain their self-esteem and sense of superiority. They may use others to gain admiration and validation, leading to emotionally draining interactions (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). Albert Bandura's social learning theory suggests that behaviour is learned through observation and imitation.
If someone grows up in a dysfunctional situational dynamic environment where manipulative behaviour is normalised, they may adopt similar patterns in their own relationships (Bandura, 1977). Leon Festinger's cognitive dissonance theory suggests that individuals experience psychological discomfort when their actions and beliefs are inconsistent. Manipulative behaviour can arise as a way to reduce this discomfort by justifying actions that align with their desired self-image (Festinger, 1957).
Case Study Example:
Ms. A, a 32-year-old woman diagnosed with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD), presents a classic case of manipulative behaviour within a clinical setting:
Background: Ms. A has a history characterised by unstable interpersonal relationships, intense and rapidly changing emotions, and repetitive self-harm behaviours. Her interactions often involve:
Splitting: She would often idealise or devalue staff members, quickly shifting her perception from one extreme to another. If a staff member complied with her demands, they were "the best"; if not, they were "the worst."
Self-Harm as Manipulation: Ms. A engaged in self-injury when her emotional needs were not immediately met or when she felt abandoned, which was sometimes interpreted by staff as an attempt to manipulate for attention or to prevent discharge.
Triangulation: She would tell conflicting stories to different staff members, creating discord and confusion among the team. For example, telling one nurse she was suicidal to avoid being discharged while claiming to another she felt much better.
Intervention:
Dialectical Behaviour Therapy (DBT): Specifically tailored for BPD, DBT was implemented to help Ms. A manage her emotions and reduce manipulative behaviours through skills in emotional regulation, distress tolerance, interpersonal effectiveness, and mindfulness.
Boundary Setting: The treatment team established clear, consistent boundaries. They agreed not to react to immediate manipulations but to address her needs through structured therapeutic sessions.
Outcome: Over time, as Ms. A learned to apply DBT skills, her manipulative behaviours decreased. She began to verbalise her feelings more constructively and showed less need for self-harm as a means of communication or control.
This case exemplifies how what might appear as manipulation can often be an expression of underlying emotional dysregulation and coping mechanisms developed from conditions like BPD. The therapeutic approach not only aimed at symptom management but also at understanding the root of these behaviors, which is crucial for long-term change.
Impact on Mental Health
Manipulative behaviour, as seen in cases like Ms. A's, can significantly impact mental health. Victims of such behaviours often experience:
Emotional exhaustion
Stress and anxiety
Decreased self-esteem
The case of Ms. A illustrates the complexity of dealing with manipulative behaviour both from the perspective of the individual exhibiting the behaviour and those around them. Understanding these dynamics is vital for developing effective interventions and support systems.
Limitations of CBT and DBT:
While Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) and Dialectical Behaviour Therapy (DBT) are highly regarded for their effectiveness in treating a variety of mental health issues, including those involving manipulative behaviours, they are not a panacea:
Individual Differences: People's responses to therapy vary due to factors like personality, cultural background, and the specific nature of their issues. What works for one individual might not work for another.
Complex Cases: For individuals with multiple diagnoses or complex trauma histories, these therapies might need to be integrated with other approaches like psychodynamic therapy, EMDR (Eye Movement Desensitisation and Reprocessing), or pharmacological treatment to address all facets of their condition.
Patient Engagement: The success of CBT and DBT often depends on the patient's willingness to engage with the therapeutic process, which can be challenging for those with certain mental health conditions or life situations.
Therapeutic Relationship: The quality of the therapeutic alliance can significantly influence outcomes. If there's a mismatch in therapeutic style or personality, even well-established therapies might not yield the desired results.
This acknowledgment does not undermine the value of CBT and DBT but highlights the necessity for personalised treatment plans. Tailoring therapy to fit the individual's unique needs, circumstances, and therapeutic goals often requires flexibility and sometimes the integration of multiple therapeutic modalities.
The impact of manipulative behaviour on mental health can be severe. Constantly dealing with mixed signals and manipulation can lead to emotional exhaustion, stress, and self-doubt. Victims may begin to question their own perceptions and feelings, leading to decreased self-esteem and confidence. Prolonged exposure to such behaviour can contribute to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues. Furthermore, victims may withdraw from social interactions to avoid further manipulation, resulting in feelings of loneliness and isolation. Coping strategies are essential for maintaining mental health and wellbeing. Setting clear boundaries and limiting interactions with manipulative individuals can help protect one's emotional health. Seeking support from friends, family, or mental health professionals can provide a safe space to navigate these challenges and develop effective coping mechanisms. Recognising and addressing manipulative behaviour is essential for maintaining mental health and wellbeing. Prioritising self-care and setting boundaries can help create a healthier and more supportive environment.
References
Grok (2024) Case Study
Bowlby, J. (1988). A Secure Base: Parent-Child Attachment and Healthy Human Development. Basic Books.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Prentice Hall.
Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press.
Schmidt, P. (2021). Crossing the Lines: Manipulation, Social Impairment, and a Challenging Emotional Life. The Phenomenology of Social Impairments.
Cowie, H. (2018). Cyberbullying and its impact on young people's emotional health and well-being. The Psychiatrist.
Arif, A., Qadir, M. A., Martins, R. S., & Khuwaja, H. M. A. (2024). The impact of cyberbullying on mental health outcomes amongst university students: A systematic review. PLOS Mental Health.
Schenk, A. M., & Fremouw, W. J. (2012). Prevalence, psychological impact, and coping of cyberbullying victims among college students. Journal of School Violence, 11(1), 21-37.
Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at School: What We Know and What We Can Do. Blackwell Publishing.
Rigby, K. (2003). Consequences of bullying in schools. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 48(9), 583-590.
Comments